Keywords : Media trials, Digital privacy, Criminal justice system, Victim rights, and Responsible journalism

Abstract : In the modern digital age, media often assumes an informal courtroom role, blurring the line between freedom of expression and an individual’s right to privacy and dignity. Media trials, characterized by sensational reporting and premature conclusions, disrupt this balance, significantly influencing public opinion and affecting the privacy, emotional well-being, and societal perception of victims, particularly in high-profile cases. This study explores the dynamics of media trials, focusing on their implications for victims and the legal system in India, where media organizations frequently assume quasi-judicial roles in prominent cases. Through an analysis of case studies and judicial rulings, the research examines the consequences of media trials, including their impact on the right to a fair trial, the creation of public bias, and violations of personal privacy. While media trials aim to promote accountability, they often undermine judicial integrity and fairness, resulting in a conflict between public interest and individual rights. The study emphasizes the need for a robust legislative framework to regulate media coverage of ongoing legal proceedings, ensuring a balance between the media’s role in ensuring accountability and the preservation of judicial sanctity and individual dignity. Additionally, the importance of ethical journalism is highlighted, stressing the role of the media in upholding democratic values while respecting due process and equity. Responsible media should act as a pillar of democracy, fostering informed public discourse without compromising the rights of individuals involved in legal matters.

Download